Apr 4th, 2008
Texas Judge Grants Temporary Restraining Order In Clear Channel Case
For 16 months, radio giant Clear Channel Communications Inc.’s future has hung in limbo as the company battled to push through its proposed sale to Thomas H. Lee Partners LP and Bain Capital Partners LLC. With that deal now facing collapse, Clear Channel potentially faces another epic struggle: going it alone in a faltering radio industry.
The Clear Channel sale for the moment has fallen into a legal tangle over the failure to complete the transaction. Clear Channel and its private-equity buyers, Bain Capital and THL, have filed lawsuits claiming that a syndicate of Wall Street securities firms and banks has illegally balked at their obligation to fund the deal.
At issue is the credit agreement that the company would need to draw on; Clear Channel and the private-equity firms say that because of worsening credit-market conditions, the banks are trying to wiggle out of terms they agreed to when the deal was first agreed.
On Thursday, a district court judge in Texas issued a restraining order forbidding the banks from refusing to fund the merger. Later in the day, the banks filed a notice to try to move the suit to federal court.
If the deal isn’t completed, Clear Channel will be back to square one in a business that has declined sharply during the months it has chased the sale. Since it agreed on a final sale price of $39.20 a share in May 2007, the economy has taken a hit, sending advertising into a tailspin. Over-the-airwaves radio advertising, Clear Channel’s trademark business, is shrinking. Outdoor advertising, which now represents almost half of the company’s revenue, is still growing but at a much slower pace than expected even a year ago.
Boosting performance won’t be easy, particularly since the company would be relying on — and trying to retain — any disappointed stockholding employees. Under an employee stock-purchase plan that ran until last year, employees purchased millions of shares, ranging in recent years from 144,444 shares in 2006 to 319,817 shares in 2002. Millions more shares over the years were given out in the form of options.
Tags: syndicate, texas
7 Responses to “Texas Judge Grants Temporary Restraining Order In Clear Channel Case”
She already did… she is a secret member of the Skulls and Bones and by God… they sacrificed puppies!!! Its on video… I swear… you just have to pay me 19.95 to watch it.
Bilderberg. 9/11. Criminal bungling “hidden in plain sight”.
Momentum is still being gained. The opponents are running out of feces to hurl (you can only say Barack HUSSEIN Obama so many times) and Hilary is still looking desparate.Go caucusers… really it couldn’t have been easier (although very disorganized)
Like the coldest spot in hell…
Nice site, cheapest I have found plus there game is only matching 2 numbers. Providing the tickets an everything hepls hope to the damn thing one day.
Yes…it sucks to have a two party system.Yes…it is is so contrived.and yes, most voters understand the relative worthlessness of their vote.Though I did Vote for Obama and caucus for him, the only way my vote mattered in my district (which only gets two delegates… damn republicans) was if one or the other was close to picking up over 3/4 of the vote, which wasn’t going to happen. The two got split between the Barack and Hillary.Imagine how Americans get confused w/ proportionally elected parliamentary systems or Australia’s instant runoff.WHAT!!! you strive for more democracy rather than less??? What kind of hijinks are you other modern democracies trying to pull?