Apr 13th, 2008
Rock of Love 2: Destiney Talks About the Competition
With the season finale of Rock of Love 2 up and coming, fans just can’t wait to see who Bret Michaels will choose between the thirty-something-year-old Ambre and 25-year-old Daisy, who admittedly still lives with her ex-boyfriend. In the last episode of the VH1 reality dating series, we saw Bret Michaels get some quality time with the final three women and a few of their relatives. Destiney’s father had the time of his life when Bret gave him a little ride on Bret’s Harley. However, when it came to elimination time, it was Destiney who had to pack her bags and walk away.
VH1 recently sat down with Destiney to talk about the relationships she had with the girls in the house and her entire experience with Bret Michaels on Rock of Love 2.
During the competition, Destiney’s honesty caught the attention of viewers, making them think that she was too "real for reality TV." In fact, this became more evident when she got into a conflict with Kristy Joe.
"The response I’ve been getting from a lot of people…came from me giving Kristy Joe so much s***," Destiney said in talking about her straightforward attitude when it came to Kristy Joe. "I got a lot of negative feedback, but you know, I don’t have a problem with her at all. The situation of being on a reality show makes you act in ways you normally wouldn’t."
While other women would easily fall into that certain emotional situation, Destiney thought twice before letting her feelings get the best of her. Despite landing a spot on the final three, she was not as in love with Bret Michaels as the other women were.
"When Daisy and Ambre came to me before my elimination to tell me that they were really in love with him, I saw their passion for him. I didn’t share that with them," she admitted. Moreover, she believed that the time constraint factored in her lack of emotions for Bret.
Tags: 2, finale, love, rock
10 Responses to “Rock of Love 2: Destiney Talks About the Competition”
Nothing to see here, move on…
My first thought when I read the article; the first paragraph just tosses out known physics and - I assume - the rest is based on ignoring what we (but not the author) already know?
Wait, did you just admit you wanted a criminal for president? Ahaha, the double standard the left has never stops astounding me.
Also, the Simpsons did it.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treehouse_of_Horror_VII#The_Genesis_Tub
Yeah, he made that classic, dumbass, rookie mistake — telling the truth. He’s obviously not cut out for public office.
Ever hear a noob to pro sports talk about the game “slowing down” for him? Consider that concept, then watch Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure.
I wrote a short story some time back about future intelligences debating whether or not biological organisms could have been “intelligent” because of their processing speed. I posted it on my blog here http://zzascape.blogspot.com/2008/04/interruption.html. [Reddit’s help page isn’t working, so I can’t find the escape sequence for a link, damnit] .Creative Science Quarterly couldn’t make sense of it, but I’m sure Reddit readers won’t have any trouble recognizing that a NOP is a nap for a computer.
tree epistemology != human epistemology.
Research indicates that the effect of time appearing to pass more slowly is more a trick of memory than of perception in the moment.Edit for clarity.