Katey

Obama's neighbor Ayers

ayers obama

Bill Ayers in February 2000. Photo for the Tribune by Kevin Tanaka
by Frank James
Many people are likely wondering “Who’s this Bill Ayers guy?” about whom so many words were expended at last night’s Democratic presidential debate between Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Clinton.
Ayers was a 1960s radical, a leader in the Weathermen, a group which exploded a few bombs, one of which accidentially killed three of its members. Ayers, along with his wife Bernadine Dohrn, went undergound for years only to eventually reemerge to become a University of Illinois education professor, a Hyde Park neighbor to Obama and, now, a touchpoint in the 2008 presidential race.
School reform crusader Bill Ayers works within the system now, but don’t ask the former Weatherman to apologize for his radical past
By Don Terry. Don Terry is a Tribune staff reporter.
A good-looking married couple from Chicago, professional, accomplished and just the other side of middle age, are on their annual August vacation in northern California, reminiscing about their youth, their fugitive days.
They are sitting on a bluff, overlooking the Pacific Ocean, the soothing sounds of the crashing surf floating up to surround them like background music in yoga class. A chilly fog has rolled in.In the old days, the couple enjoyed coming to such places. The sea air tasted like freedom. But they had to be careful about who saw them trying to be normal. They had to remember to use their phony names.
For years, his was “Joe.” Hers was “Rose.”
“I was at the top of my field,” the wife says. “I was on the FBI’s 10 most wanted list.”
She smiles at her husband.
“He was on the bottom,” she adds. “I was most wanted, he was just wanted, sort of wanted.”
“Sexism,” he contends, shrugging. “We were facing the same federal charges. She has better legs. I could have been No. 1.”

weblogs.baltimoresun.com


Tags: ,

10 Responses to “Obama's neighbor Ayers”

  1. Hepsie on 17 Apr 2008 at 1:59 pm

    Wait… that means… KUCINICH IS 23%!!

  2. Toni on 17 Apr 2008 at 2:49 pm

    According to this article, 39% to 26% is a “fragile lead” and 29% to 18% is a “slight edge”

  3. Eugene on 17 Apr 2008 at 3:40 pm

    Even my own sarcasm disgusts me.

  4. Katelyn on 17 Apr 2008 at 4:30 pm

    I was wondering the same thing

  5. Trista on 17 Apr 2008 at 5:21 pm

    That’s fine. With the way the delegates are handed out proportionally, this will keep Obama in the lead while barely helping Hillary. It will also take more delegates off the table, so Hillary is running out of ways to catch up.The problem now is figuring out what to do in Florida since they are now claiming that they no longer have the voting machines and can’t possibly organize in time to revote, even if they get the money to do it.

  6. Nevada on 17 Apr 2008 at 6:11 pm

    Yes. In NH, Obama was some 10pts ahead of Clinton.

  7. Jacquette on 17 Apr 2008 at 7:02 pm

    I’ll take these margins anyday. It’ll give Hillary a few more delegates, but it will keep her behind, and she’ll having nothing more to complain about.

  8. Judi on 17 Apr 2008 at 7:53 pm

    Diebold: Obama 14%, Clinton 51%, Edwards 12%

  9. Rowley on 17 Apr 2008 at 8:43 pm

    YOU FORGOT ABOUT RON PAUL. RON PAUL 100%, OBVIOUSLY