Apr 22nd, 2008
The Third Side Also Exists: Regarding the Likely American Attack …
The Third Side Also Exists:
Regarding the Likely American Attack on Iran
by Nasser Zarafshan
In the current conflict over Iran, the most important question is what America’s real goal in Iran and the Middle East is. Why? Because, as long as we don’t have a certain and reliable answer to this question, as long as we don’t know what the opponent’s hidden real purpose in this crisis is, we are incapable of figuring out what is to be done, in other words, incapable of collectively taking the correct position on this situation. The American foreign policy leaders’ claim in this situation is very simple. They say that the objective of the American interference in this region is to spread democracy and human rights. Based on this claim, the social order that is currently dominant in the world, whose hegemon is America, pretends that there is no ulterior motive or interest and that there is nothing behind its interference. Pro-Americans in Iran and the region, too, naively repeat the same claim. However, does everyone in Iran and the region share the same naive interpretation of the matter? Below — to the extent that space in this short article allows — I will try to answer this question. But there is another question, too: when rights and freedoms of a nation are negated and trampled upon and its progress and development are blocked due to the domination of reactionaries, is it the duty of a destructive foreign power to restore this nation’s rights and freedoms and open the gate of progress and development? Where in history is there an instance of a foreign power, instead of the nation in question itself, doing any such thing?
Those who encourage foreign interference do not understand its implications and have no idea about the impacts of war on people’s lives. They propagandize a vulgar formula that insinuates that anyone who opposes war and foreign interference is in support of the Islamic Republic. There is no evidence for such a claim. Those who insist on it do so in order to "terrorize" the opponents of war and foreign interference and hide their own worship of foreign powers behind it.
Tags: capitals, radio, washington
8 Responses to “The Third Side Also Exists: Regarding the Likely American Attack …”
As irritating as Billy is, this is an every day occurrence in radio. Shows get dropped and added to stations more times than you can count. Even the most popular ones.
Good! Now I won’t have to cringe while waiting for “The Don & Mike Show” to begin.I will withhold judgement on the addition of Jim “Dead Air” Rome and asshats Oscar and Chad.D&M Radio Gods!O&A Party Rock!-h
Really, there was spit and foam all over everything.
O’Reilly has a talk show too? My god, they really are gluttons for punishment.
Oh, thank god…He’s easily been one of the worst portions of their programming for YEARS.Although “Unzipped” after Don and Mike nights is simply shite.
Is there any good analysis of why ‘Air America’ was such a failure?
Shh, you’re criticizing a pro-liberal web site. We Redditers have little tolerance for that.