In another time, after another Oscar race, “Atonement” would have arrived on DVD trumpeting its many Academy Awards rather than its lone statue, for Dario Marianelli’s score.
I still don’t understand its fall from grace — it was too old-fashioned, detractors suggested. On April 15, the last of the five Best Picture nominees will be out (”Juno” arrives that day and “There Will Be Blood” is due April 8) and you can play armchair quarterback, deciding which picture or performer deserved the gold.
“Atonement” (Universal Studios Home Entertainment, $29.98), based on the Ian McEwan novel of the same name, is a sweeping tragic romance starring Keira Knightley and James McAvoy as lovers caught in the crossfires of a single shocking lie and World War II. The cast also includes Saoirse Ronan, Brenda Blethyn, Vanessa Redgrave and Romola Garai.
DVD extras include a feature commentary by director Joe Wright and a half-dozen deleted scenes, all dispensable although an alternative start to a Dunkirk sequence shows a soldier vomiting after seeing a dismembered leg blown into a tree.
One disappointment: No sign of scenes shot for the movie’s ending (a party, as in the novel, and featuring Redgrave) and not used for its theatrical release. Screenwriter Christopher Hampton said in an interview in September that they were filmed but edited out, to get to the ending faster.
Better than usual are two short features, one on the making of the movie, including its bravura five-minute tracking shot and Knightley’s gorgeous green dress, and the other on adapting the book. That meant turning a 130,000-word novel into a 110-page screenplay with maybe 25,000 words, a task brilliantly executed by Christopher Hampton.
McEwan says in one of the featurettes, “I’ve decided that it’s best not to do your own screenplays. Best to move on,” rather than hanging around like a bad conscience saying you’ve ruined my vision. He ended up as producer on a film that enhanced his vision and brought it to remarkable life.

post-gazette.com


Tags: ,
Barbie

Ananda Krishnan due in SL

Ananda Krishnan due in SL
Maxis Malaysia boss T. Ananda Krishnan isdue in Sri Lanka this week in connectionwith the NTT/SLT deal, market sources said.
Multi-billionaire Ananda Krishnan is aMalaysian Tamil whose parents were from SriLanka.
However, it’s not clear whether Maxis, atelecoms operator in Malaysia, will buy allof NTT Japan’s 35.2% stake in SLT, or settlefor only 25%, thereby ensuring that NTTwill continue to maintain the right ofappointing/having the CEO of their choice inSLT, by ensuring that NTT will retain aminimum 10% stake in SLT as per itsshareholder agreement, they said.
Last week NTT transferred all of its 35.2%shareholding in SLT to the Colombo StockExchange CDS, a move, which market sourcesinterpreted as a prelude to this Japanesetelecoms company preparing to divest itsholdings in SLT.
SLT has a total of 1.8 billion issued shareswith the government being its biggestshareholder with a 49.2% stake. SLT, alisted company, also has a public float of15.3% of its equity.
The past few days have seen heavy trading inSLT shares on speculation that Maxis willtrigger the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Mergers and Acquisitions Codeby buying NTT’s 35.2% stake in SLT.If aninvestor buys a minimum 30% stake in alisted company, he triggers this Code,thereby being liable to make an offer tothat company’s remaining shareholders to buytheir stakes also in the company at itshighest traded price in the one yearpreceding the date the Code was triggered.
SLT on Wednesday closed at Rs. 40.50 ashare, down 25 cents over its previousclosing price, on a volume of 6.2 millionshares. There was no trading on Thursday andFriday on account of holidays.
Market speculation is that Maxis willexecute this deal at Rs. 42 a share.
NTT bought this 35.2% stake from thegovernment in 1997 (plus management control)for US$ 225 million.
It has been reported that Maxis has beeneyeing NTT’s stake in SLT since last year,as part of its regional expansion drive. Butits buying was stalled after this issue wentto courts and was only revived earlier thismonth, after the court gave NTT thegreenlight to sell its stake in SLT if itwishes to.

thesundayleader.lk


Tags: , , , ,

Chanting "Off Iraqi soil, no blood for oil," scores of anti-war protesters rallied in Minneapolis Saturday demanding an end to the U.S. occupation of troops in Iraq.
With flags and banners waving amid various proclamations of peace, Meredith Aby, a member of the local Anti-War Committee, said a majority of American citizens want the war over.
"People need to get out in the streets and demand change. Just saying the war is unpopular is not enough," Aby said. "People should think more critically how this government beats the drums for war."
Instead, protesters banged their own drums as they marched and shouted phrases including, "(President) Bush lies, thousands die, troops home now," under overcast skies and a brisk chill from Uptown to Loring Park.
Traffic along Hennepin Avenue slowed occasionally as numerous passing vehicles honked in support. No arrests were made.
Similar anti-war rallies were held Saturday across the country to mark the war’s fifth anniversary. More are scheduled through next week.
Many at Saturday’s rally in Minneapolis clearly remember when the United States bombed Baghdad on March 19, 2003 and President Bush warned, "We will accept no outcome but victory."
"I’m fed up with the rhetoric and the violence," said protester Kyle Anderson, 23, of Minneapolis. "I’m tired of our politicians running for office skirting around the issue, too. How much longer are we going to be over there?"

read_more


Tags: ,
admin

Blood Moon

“Blood Moon” is the first novel by A.W. Gryphon, whose previous works include the scripts for two indie films and episodes of Sabrina the Animated Series. The story revolves around Amelia Pivens Kreutzer, a young woman with jet black hair and piercing green eyes who also happens to be a natural witch and “The One” [sic] prophesied to reunite the broken factions of witches in the world, usher in a new age, and so on. Amelia has a tragic past: she saw her mother murdered in front of her when she was seven, saw her husband (one of the youngest Classical pianists in Europe — do NOT follow that thought process out to its logical conclusion) also murdered in front of her, saw her father die of an evil spell (i.e. murdered) in front of her. (You may have noticed a pattern. It includes descriptions of how each one’s last thoughts and words are all about comforting poor Amelia, and how they breathe their last.)
Amelia’s rare insights into the works of Francisco Goya have catapulted her to a high-ranking job at London’s National Gallery. While we are told some of these “insights,” they mainly exist so the audience can think the protagonist is smart. Also, despite having been raised early on in Cunningham-based Wicca and also having been able to control immense power and forces at a tender age, Amelia heartbrokenly denied her heritage until she conveniently remembers everything a few days before her Very Special Birthday. Assisted by her
creepy old guy friend Jeremy (”the spitting image of Sir Anthony Hopkins”) she strikes against her mysterious foes, who all dress in black suits and all drive black towncars in defiance of any sensible rules of reconnaissance. Also, she writes tender letters to her dead husband as the funeral director and his wife look on and muse about what the “poor girl” is going to do. (The heroine gets called “young girl” in almost every description, despite being nearly thirty. I can’t tell if it’s a subtle use of common language to evoke a recoil at the incorrect and patronizing attitudes of unbelievers, or just bad writing.)
A sample from the Prologue, transcribed exactly as written:
Maeve was in labor. She was two months pre-mature, but the baby was coming quickly. In a matter of minutes a little girl was born. The woman assisting in the birth wrapped the child in a cloth and placed her in the proud High Priest arms, just in time for Maeve to scream again. The woman rushed back over to her. She placed her hand on Maeve’s belly and looked to The Coven, then to Domhall. There was a second child coming. A twin. She had no sooner announced it, when the child pushed through. In an unworldly and quick moment, the High Priestess gave birth to a son. Domhall and The Coven were overcome with emotion. They could not help, but know, that this was a sign not only from the God and the Goddess, but from The All.
Setting aside the ballistic approach to punctuation and capitalization, the adolescent fantasy version of Wicca and its history, and the protagonist who zooms to the top of the Mary Sue chart within the first few pages, this is still not a good book. The prose is leaden and repetitive, while the dialogue is lifted straight out of a B-movie mystery. The villains are one-dimensional, which at least means they fit in nicely with the heroes. The plot twists are by-the-numbers when they make any sense at all. The names of the characters aren’t even spelled consistently through the book.
And then there’s the pronunciation guide.
“Blood Moon” is at its core about one flavor of Celtic-derived witchcraft, and as such, the pronunciation on some names is difficult for American readers. A reader seeing the name “Budahach” for the first time might benefit from a parenthetical explaining that it is pronounced “BOO-ach” (or the reader might not benefit, as there’s no accompanying explanation of whether it’s a hard or soft “ch”). However, when the author feels required to provide a pronunciation guide for “coven” (”CUH-ven,” not to be confused with “in-DUH-vidual”), the question rapidly becomes: “Just how dumb is the target audience for this novel?”
As someone who has been out of the broom closet for over twenty years, I weep in my heart for any readers who make this their first exposure to Wicca. Popular culture already has “The Craft” and the condescending portrayals of neopagans in the Buffy-verse to give grief to followers of modern Earth-based religions. If “Blood Moon” has one good thing about it, it is that the author is clearly very earnest in her support of Wiccans and witches. Unfortunately, the book’s low quality will drive actual pagans away with cries of: “Get off our side! You’re making us look dumb!” (I suspect this must be how most Christians feel when someone mentions the “Left Behind” books.)
The single most frightening thing about this novel is that it is intended to be the first in a series. My advice is to reread the first Harry Potter book. Whatever your opinion about the later HP books, you’ll enjoy Sorcerer’s Stone / Philosopher’s Stone far more than this travesty, and at least no one (probably) will walk away thinking they’ve just learned the Secret True History of Witchcraft.
Edit: For the sake of clarity, and lest someone think the mentions of more popular works of fantasy puts this book on the level of those same works, let me state the following outright:
- If you are a fan of Buffy: The Vampire Slayer, do not read this book.
- If you are a fan of the Harry Potter series, do not read this book.
- If you are a fan of “The Craft,” do not read this book.
- If you have Views about people who intentionally spell “magic” with a “k,” do not read this book.
- If you have Views about Wicca being presented as having been around as a named religion for more than five hundred years (yes, even in fiction), do not read this book.
Or do. It’s a free country. Just don’t say I didn’t warn you.
James A. Rock & Company

firefox.org


Tags: ,